| Once approved by
the Dean, the proposal is routed to the Office of Grant Services for final
administrative approvals by the Associate Provost for Academic Affairs and the Academic Vice
President.
Purpose of Signatory Approvals on
the Transmittal Form
The signature of the Project Director
certifies that the Project Director is eligible to receive funding according to the
funding sources restrictions. The Project Director also certifies that the
information contained in the proposal and the Transmittal Form is accurate and the budget,
including matching obligations, is reasonable. The signature of the Project Director
assures the University that the Project Director is committed to the project and that it
will be carried out in accordance with the funding source and University requirements.
The signature of the Department
Chair certifies that the proposal is within the departments academic and
programmatic objectives and that it endorses and supports the proposed activities. The
signature also affirms that time commitments of the department personnel are realistic and
approved and guarantees departmental matching, if included in the proposal.
The signature of the Dean
certifies that the proposal is within the colleges academic and programmatic
objectives and that the Dean endorses and supports the proposed activities. The signature
also affirms: 1) required matching funds from existing college resources will be provided;
2) facility/space/renovation needs as described in the application will be provided; and
3) the college will take responsibility for any on-going fiscal or programmatic
responsibility after award termination.
The
signature of the Associate Provost for Academic Affairs certifies that the proposal has been reviewed for
completeness, budgetary accuracy, consistency with the funding source and Xavier
requirements, and overall quality.
The signature of the Academic
Vice President certifies that the proposal is appropriate to the overall mission
of the proposing unit(s) and the University.
The signature of the
Senior Vice President of Financial Administration is required if the
University is committing over $10,000 in matching funds toward the
project.
Additional signatures
may be needed to indicate approval in specific areas. For example, if the proposed
activities cross institutional reporting lines (for example, a project that may affect two
different colleges), both Deans will be may be required to approve.
The signature of the Comptroller
may be required to certify that the proposal meets institutional fiscal standards and the
requested matching funds are available in the designated budget.
Assistance By the Office of Grant
Services
When the proposal is received by the
Office of Grant Services, it is reviewed for completeness, budgetary accuracy, consistency
with funding source and Xavier requirements, and overall quality. Any needed corrections
or changes to the proposal will be made by the Project Director.
When the approval and review processes
are completed, the Office of Grant Services will assist the Project Director with copying
and mailing the final proposal to the funding source. Project Director(s) will receive a
copy of the Transmittal Form containing all required signatures. This will serve as
official notification that the project has been approved.
Collaborations and Cooperative
Agreements With Other Organizations and Institutions
Xavier University encourages
faculty/staff to collaborate with other institutions and organizations. The same
requirements which apply to internal review of proposals submitted by the University also
apply to collaborative activities. The proposed project activities, a budget reflecting
the Xavier University portion of the work to be performed, and any documentation of the
Universitys obligation to the project must be approved through the internal review
process prior to submission by the collaborating entity. A full copy of
the proposal must be received by the Office of Grant Services no later than five working
days after the collaborating entity submits it to the funding source.
Faculty serving in a consultant capacity
on a grant with another institution need only follow existing policies for reporting
outside activities. |